May 062013
 

I heard the Foo Fighters’ “Big Me” on the radio this weekend.  I was struck by two thoughts:  I am getting old, and I still hate those damn Mentos commercials.  You see, younglings, the Foo Fighters produced a very popular video for this song back in 1996.  First,  1996 was 17 years ago!  Holy crap am I getting old!  

Now the silver lining is that with that time young folks today will watch the video (below) for the catchy little tune and not get the joke.  The video parodies the god-awful Mentos commercials.  The recurring theme of  the commercials is that when you eat one of these little candies, your brainpower doubles and you suddenly realize a cute and obvious solution to any minor annoyance or problem currently in front of you.  (I wonder what happens if you eat a Mentos when you see a Mentos commercial begin.  Does the universe implode?).

Can you imagine a false-claims advertising suit brought against the company that makes Mentos?  I can.

Plaintiff:  I ate six packs of Mentos every day for 10 years, and me not more smart.  All I got was diabetes.  My doctor says I should try and lose weight, but when I switched to drinking diet cola, it would explode out of every hole in my body.  I guess it’s because my blood is filled with Mentos.  Now I can’t even enjoy diet cola because of your commercials’ lies.  Gimme money now!

 

 

 

So aging can be a good thing because you get to see a horrid ad campaign end and slowly fade from cultural memory.  It brings a moment of joy when you consider future generations are spared the torture of being exposed to Mentos commercials.

Wait a minute…  Did I just expose a new generation to the idea that Mentos commercials exist?   Aww, damn it!   Listen, kids:  do yourself a favor and do not Google Mentos commercials. 

Digg This
Apr 092013
 

Senate Minority Leader and Lead Filibusterer Mitch McConnell was recorded at a meeting with aides discussing opposition research on potential opponent Ashley Judd. While McConnell deserves contempt, after reading through the transcript, I’m not finding anything noteworthy from him. His staff is doing almost all of the talking. Some of what they say might be interesting, but this is a lame way to attack McConnell. His years leading the obstructionists in the Senate should provide ample and more outrageous fodder for that.

Maybe this is only getting a lot of attention this week because it is a mean-old-man leads attack on adorable celebrity lady who dares to consider challenging him. So it’s more of an Ashley Judd story.

In case Mother Jones is forced to remove it, below are highlights from the transcript. It does shed a light on how this guy’s staff (and probably, and sadly, politicians in general) operates.

From Mother Jones:

Sen. Mitch McConnell: If I could interject…I assume most of you have played the, the game Whac-A-Mole? [Laughter.] This is the Whac-A-Mole period of the campaign…when anybody sticks their head up, do them out, and we’re even planning to do it with the Courier here shortly, so…

And, that’s all from McConnell.

Presenter: Yeah, it is really hard to get your arms around…

The good news is, she’s to the far left of every issue she’s taken a public stance on, not just far left, nationwide…[Inaudible.] So you know one of the first themes we can sort of hit on, clearly, is that she openly supports President Obama.

Their first evidence that she’s “far to the left” of the country is that she supports Obama. It shows their skewed perspective, and how their unfamiliarity with the facts could be their undoing. This staffer is from the “Obama is a secret Kenyan Muslim Marxist Socialist” crowd if he actually believes that Obama is synonymous with the far left.

Presenter: Another thing is she’s clearly anti-coal. She’s tweeted that “the era of the coal plant is over, unacceptable, it’s the dirtiest. We in the US can do better, we need to innovate.”

I’ve omitted all of her mountaintop removal stuff. It’s a whole separate category. It doesn’t quite test as well. But she has, we have her on film, she’s led protests. She’s done speeches at National Press Club condemning mountaintop removal.

This part might be the most interesting bit of the whole meeting. The campaign says they have her on record as being against mountaintop removal, but, “Hey, guys, we’re going to leave that out, because even we know that the majority of the public agrees with her.”

Presenter: I mean clearly she’s a carpetbagger. …

What a blockbuster revelation! I hope you didn’t hurt yourself finding that one. A Hollywood millionaire who travels and lives outside of Kentucky? Who woulda thunk it?

I guess he is assuming that Kentuckians rabidly perfer a douchebagging McConnell over a carpetbagging Judd.

Presenter: I think too she’s clearly sort of anti-sort-of-traditional American family. I think Jesse tracked this down. She described having children as selfish, and she thinks it’s unconscionable to breed. So you put that with what we’ll talk to you later about her sort of pro-choice stance and it’s sort of a, you know, pretty extreme posture to take. She also is critical of, of fathers giving away their daughters in marriage ceremonies. She says it’s a common vestige of male dominion over a women’s reproductive status when her father gives her away at a wedding. And then she’s clearly for pro-abortion.

So he found a bunch of quotes likely to shock and appall only the types of people who were going to vote for McConnell again anyway. I’m beginning to think the McConnell campaign is really getting ripped off by their opposition researchers. I thought they were getting paid to find something useful.

Presenter: She’s an open advocate as you can see. Anyhow I know this is sort of a sensitive subject but you know at least worth putting on your radar screen is that she is critical…[inaudible] sort of traditional Christianity. She sort of views it as sort of a vestige of patriarchy. She says Christianity gives a God like a man, presented and discussed exclusively with male imagery which legitimizes and seals male power, the intention to dominate even if that intention is nowhere visible.

And this is sort of an interview that sort of manifests this sort of I would say oddly synthetic approach to Christianity.

[Plays recording.]

Judd’s voice: I still choose the God of my understanding as the God of my childhood. I have to expand my God concept from time to time, and you know particularly I enjoy native faith practices, and have a very nature-based God concept. I’d like to think I’m like St. Francis in that way. Brother Donkey, Sister Bird. [Laughter.]

Presenter: Brother Donkey, Sister Bird! [Laughter.]

Male voice: The people at Southeast Christian [Church] would take to the streets with pitchforks. [Laughter.]

Presenter: Brother…That’s my favorite line so far. Absolute favorite one so far. [Laughter.]

She also is an open advocate of gay marriage. You can see this is what she tweeted after election night when Maryland approved same sex marriage. “It’s okay to love whom you love.” And then she talks about Maryland’s bill.

Yes, Judd sounds goofy in a quote that can easily be taken out of context and presented as sincere, but I’ll repeat: So he found a bunch of quotes likely to shock and appall only the types of people who were going to vote for McConnell again anyway. I’m beginning to think the McConnell campaign is really getting ripped off by their opposition researchers. I thought they were getting paid to find something useful.

By the way, I chuckled when he said “synthetic approach to Christianity.”  That’s like saying her plastic is too artificial.

Presenter:  Ah, and again. She’s clearly, this sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced. I mean it’s been documented. Jesse can go in chapter and verse from her autobiography about, you know, she’s suffered some suicidal tendencies. She was hospitalized for 42 days when she had a mental breakdown in the ’90s. Phil Maxson found this, which sort of I think is a pretty revealing interview.

[Plays recording.]

Judd’s voice: I call it the American anesthesia. You know, I come back to this country. I freak out in airports. The colors, the sounds, all those different ways of packaging the same snack but trying to, you know, make it look like it’s distinct and different and convince consumers that they have to have it. I mean all of that. The last time I came home from a trip, I absolutely flipped out when I saw pink fuzzy socks on a rack. I mean, I can never anticipate what is going to push me over the edge. [Laughter.]

But in a few weeks, you know, I’m driving along smooth roads and I think nothing of it. I’m, you know, choosing between four different brands of cereal from plastic dispensers so that I don’t have to have, you know, ugly, mismatched boxes on my shelf, and I don’t think anything of it. You know?

Presenter: So pink fuzzy socks are of concern. [Laughter.]

Female voice: …at Fancy Farm. We’ll all take pink fuzzy socks. [Laughter.]

This is the arguably offensive part of the meeting where it appears the gang is mocking mental illness or Judd’s goofy description of what she says she experienced. I think he almost admits the attack is a bit mean when he says “this sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced.”

I’ll end by letting these scumbags know that I’m not alone in preferring a candidate suffering from a treatable mental illness over an allegedly mentally healthy one who explicitly made it his mission to subvert American democracy. Anyone else feel like some turtle soup?

from BusterBlog: Mitch McConnell: Elderly Mutant Plutocrat Turtle?

Digg This
Mar 172013
 

Time to fill out your brackets again and be reminded of the fun and futility of March Madness.

I do this every year. It’s amusing to feel like a genius for a couple of days (“Hey, look, one of my 17 brackets only has 3 missed picks through Sunday!”) only to come crashing back to reality later. All of my brackets are usually shredder-ready by the second Friday.

The odds of picking a perfect bracket are way worse than winning the lottery — not even in the same ballpark, probably not even the same galaxy.

Contest Odds (1 in)
Mega Millions lottery jackpot 175,711,536
Perfect bracket (choosing higher seeds) 35,360,000,000
Perfect bracket (randomly selected) 9,223,372,036,854,775,808

 

That’s why everybody and their grandmother can offer million dollar prizes for their online bracket contest. It would be hilarious if some common bracket combination came true and they would have to pay up. On the last weekend, we would know a lot of people would be so close to the big prize. Shares of the company offering the prize would take a dive. What if all higher seeds did win? On several sites that would be the default pick set. Hundreds of people could win on computer or user error.

At least, in office pools you are only competing with mere mortals instead of perfection. They can be more exciting since you are still in the hunt longer. Of course, in office pools you probably know who the winner is, which could lead to more of a humiliated feeling when you are smoked by the guy who based his picks on which team had the cooler mascot or the woman who only picked teams from blue states.

Have no fear. You, too, can have a winning wacky bracket. Here are some suggestions on how to decide between two teams.

  • The old coin flip.
  • Which team is first/last alphabetically
  • The team with the fattest player
  • Mascot fight!
  • Oldest university
  • Ask a toddler to pick
  • Assign them sections on a dartboard
  • Lowest SAT scores
  • Uniform color/design
  • Distance from sea level
  • Distance from your house
  • Distance from Sarah Palin’s house (where you can see Russia)

If you have any more suggestions, share them in the comments section.

Finally, for your convenience, here’s a list of free bracket contests. Add your own in the comments section, and I’ll try to update the list if I find some new ones.

http://tournament.fantasysports.yahoo.com/t1

http://games.espn.go.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/en/

http://msn.foxsports.com/fantasy/collegebasketball/tourney/

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/ncaa-tournament/brackets

http://madness.nbcsports.com/

https://apps.facebook.com/bracketinsanity/

http://washingtonpost.com/bracket-challenge

http://www.enjoymoremadness.com/

http://cheapseat.blogs.starnewsonline.com/12139/ncaa-hoops-tournament-bracket-contest-2013/

http://sportsillustrated.collegehoops.upickem.net

The Jets Blog http://games.espn.go.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/en/group?groupID=45316&entryID=510939

http://www.mybasin.com/bracket/

http://www.powwows.com/2013/03/13/2013-ncaa-bracket-challenge/

http://www.droid-life.com/2013/03/18/contest-enter-the-droid-life-ncaa-bracket-challenge-2013-win-a-nexus-7-and-100-in-google-play-gift-cards/

http://www.smokingmusket.com/2013/3/17/4117240/smoking-musket-ncaa-tournament-2013-bracket-challenge

http://www.cleveland.com/marchmadness/index.ssf/2013/03/ncaa_tournament_bracket_contes_1.html

Have fun!

Digg This
Feb 202013
 

In a few weeks the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case involving same-sex marriage, Hollingsworth v. Perry.

The court has accepted an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief from the Westboro Baptist Church — yes, the same goofballs that turn up to protest funerals.

God Hates Westboro Baptist Church

The fact that the Court has agreed to receive their written arguments may irritate or even enrage many, but don’t count on it making one bit of difference. The clerk assigned to read the brief at first might think it is some kind of punishment, but once s/he is finished they might think of it as a reward. The “legal” arguments presented in the WBC brief are so breathtakingly bad they are hilarious. (Although, I do pity whoever was charged with transcribing the brief from its original crayon into a more pdf-friendly text.)

The only issues that are up for argument in Hollingsworth v. Perry are:

1. Whether the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits the State of California from defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman; and

2.  Whether petitioners have standing under Article III, § 2 of the Constitution in this particular case.

The WBC brief only tangentially touches upon a small facet of #1 — and it’s a stretch: that the government has a compelling interest that it pursues through Prop 8 that sufficiently justifies any discrimination against certain groups. That might be the reason the brief wasn’t immediately recycled or returned to sender: that it is possible through enough effort to sift through the garbage and pull out something that resembles something that might be found adjacent to a legal argument. Or, really, the court just accepted the brief from WBC to see if anyone is paying attention.

The government has a duty to protect its people. Therefore, the government has a duty to protect its people from their interpretation of a wrathful god. Under their favorite translation of scripture, their interpretation of god is required (because their book is more powerful than their god) to destroy all communities that accept homosexuality. Therefore, the WBC states it is the government’s duty to protect the people from god by destroying the freedom and equality of people who their translation of scripture holds will offend god.

In sum, according to Margie Phelps and the WBC, government has a compelling interest in banning same-sex marriage, because WBC believes that it is a fact that if we fail to do so, “WE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!”

Amid the 37 pages filled almost entirely of quotes from the bible and theological commentators, there are just a few examples of original text. It is an example of poor brief writing, although she sort of admits it telling the court that she essentially leaves the rest of the legal argument to the other petitioners, respondents and amici.

“The government has the responsibility to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the people. Of all the harms that a society can face, none are worse than incurring the wrath of [g]od by a blatant policy of defiance of and disobedience to [h]is plain standard.”

The reasoning is the government must defend its people from god just like it did from the Soviet Union and other foreign aggressors. So anti-gay legislation is now defense policy? Their interpretation of god seems like a much greater threat than Saddam Hussein. It sounds like they’re saying god really does have weapons of mass destruction. Is that what our bloated military spending is for? Are the neocons planning on invading heaven and instituting a regime change?

“When this Honorable Court sits in judgment on a matter, not only is the whole world watching, but [g]od, is watching. Then backs it up with a quote from Charles Haddon Spurgeon that “they must make care that they do not misuse the power entrusted to them, for the [j]udge of judges is in session among them.” So they think threatening the court with eternal damnation is an effective legal argument.

WBC’s footnote is ridiculously erroneous, saying Spurgeon was a 19th century speaker and he lived from 1932-1992. An impressive feat indeed, evidence of a careless editor or a really powerful and bored god sending a 20th century man back in time to preach to 19th century England.

“The damage done to the minds, bodies and social welfare of this nation by drugs is nothing [emphasis in original] compared to the damage same-sex marriage will do to this nation and its people.” So you’re saying you would be OK if we married our favorite drugs?

Why did the Court agree to accept delivery of this “brief?” I think they made the right call because dealing with the cries of censorship would be more of a nuisance than just filing away this unpersuasive tripe. Like Margie Phelps said herself, look elsewhere for actual legal arguments. The fact that she still gets to put Esq. behind her name, (almost) makes me want to get another degree.

God Hates Westboro Baptist Church

Digg This
Jan 282013
 

Whether the NFL’s all-star game, the Pro Bowl, will be continued is up in the air this year.  Since it will never have the intensity of a real game,  to keep our interest, the NFL needs to amp up what it can accomplish showcasing the best of the best by exposing them to a tweaked game, everything from modest experimental rule changes to downright ridiculous twists.  Here are some options for testing their skills and creating a more entertaining spectacle.

Starters will begin the game in crazy cosutmes.  Imagine if the parade floats had to play in the game.  The fans enter the yearlong contest to design the costumes.  They must not create a serious injury risk, so it’s likely we will get a chance to see the costumes explode seconds after the first snap:  foam, flowers, and feathers everywhere.   The costumes will be unveiled the night before the game.  How do you decide who wears what?  The starters pick what they get to wear.  You could have the oldest starter pick first or have a draft lottery, to decide who picks when.  For cancer awareness, the last costume should always be a pink tutu, and shall be worn the whole game. 

For the first experiment in the rules:  make them get vertical, really vertical.   Nature does not demand a flat field.  Build a ramp (or better yet, a pyramid) that can be rolled out to cover the middle 50 yards of the field.  It will be steep.  If they are such great quarterbacks, let’s see them throw uphill.  If you stand in one endzone you will not be able to see the other even if you jump.  So the field elevation should be at least 10 feet higher at midfield.

The second is a gift to the offense, a challenge to the defense, and a nightmare for the networks:  two footballs, in play at the same time. 

Two Footballs, Two Quarterbacks: RGIII and Russell Wilson together in Pro Bowl 2015? Buddy cop movie 2017?

If the offense chooses two quarterbacks, they lose a lineman.  The TV producers will not like having to cover two footballs.  Maybe they could use split screen or keep a very wide shot.  The announcers will have to consult with their colleagues in baseball about how to make it through a long broadcast saying “two balls” over and over again without giggling.
 
The third idea shifts the balance back to the defense.  For years the offense has held the upper hand in these games.  Even it out with a 12th defender … carrying the business end of a fire hose.  He could lay down some anti-aircraft defense by shooting at the ball in flight, or he could just soak the quarterback the whole time (not as easy as you think with those linemen in the way) or he could try to stop the receiver at a very inconvenient time.  However, I would support a ban on fire hose blasts to the crotch or face.  Referee: “Unnecessary roughness: defense, illegal fire hose to the groin/crotchblasting.  30-yard penalty; first down!”

Who gets to be the hosemen?  How about a lucky fan (signing a lengthy waiver, of course)?  Put the honor up for bid on eBay, with the money going to charity.  

“Make a Wish” recipient Bobby Trent fulfills a lifelong dream of blasting quarterback Tom Brady in the stomach, all-too-easily recording the first half sack by a half pint in Pro Bowl 2016.

 

The fourth twist, now that the field is a complete mud pit (yes, a natural surface stadium is required), it’s time to release the hogs.  Since I’m sure we won’t be able to send out a swarm of real pigs — damn you, PETA! — we can use fake ones.   Three ropes cross the field in front of the offense, with 100 lb pink meatbags attached about every 20 feet.  The defense’s teammates on the sidelines would pull on the ropes to move the pigs back and forth to disrupt the offense.  It’s like adding a little foosball element to a football game. 

 If a player is tackled by a pig, he must do a belly flop in the mud in his own endzone, and leave the game and the field, delivering a free beer to someone sitting in the last row of the upper deck.  If he spills more than half the beer, he must return all the way to the front row to get another one. His team has to play a man short until he returns. 

So, NFL/Goodell, since it doesn’t matter at all who wins the Pro Bowl, and nobody cares, you need to show us some crazy stuff.  Hopefully, this kicks up a few brainstorms.  Any ideas, dear readers?

Bills, Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, Ravens, Bengals, Browns, Steelers, Texans, Colts, Jaguars, Titans, Broncos, Chiefs, Raiders, Chargers, Cowboys, Giants, Eagles, Redskins, Bears, Lions, Packers, Vikings, Falcons, Panthers, Saints, Buccaneers, Bucs, Cardinals, 49ers, Seahawks, Rams, Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets, Baltimore Ravens, Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns, Pittsburgh Steelers, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, Jacksonville Jaguars, Tennessee Titans, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders, San Diego Chargers, Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Redskins, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, New Orleans Saints, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Bucs, Arizona Cardinals, San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, St. Louis Rams

Digg This
Dec 212012
 

This should be the easiest liveblogging event ever. I expect Mayan Apocalypse Day 2012 to be much quieter than Election Day 2012. Maybe the prophecy is that by the end of the day we’ll all laugh ourselves to death.

8:15 a.m UPDATE: We’re still here. No nuts have reacted to still being here. Dogs & cats: still enemies.

Amusing image of the hour:

***********************************************
9:15 a.m. UPDATE: We’re still here. My free coffee still tastes like free coffee.

In case you haven’t heard, 33 schools in Michigan are closed today due to the date and fear of a Newtown copycat. School’s out for evah!

 

Uh, no… not even close.

*********************************************
10:15 a.m. Update: We’re still here. I guess the Mayans should have checked with Nate Silver first.

*********************************************
11:15 a.m. Update: We’re still here. I just heard from this guy:

Nostradamus

Nostradamus: “2012? Ha! The Mayans can suck my beard!”

*********************************************
12:15 p.m Update: We’re still here. An ordinary lunch was completed successfully. The world does not end via roast beef.

*********************************************
1:15 p.m Update: We’re still here.  The City of Denver had the bright idea to test its new outdoor warning sirens today.

Another sign the apocalypse is NOT upon us today: the NRA’s response to the Sandy Hook shooting is, you guessed it, MORE guns.

*********************************************
2:15 p.m Update: We’re still here. Crickets.

*********************************************
4:15 p.m Update: We’re still here.  I got outside for awhile, so let’s take inventory:

That’s great, it starts with an earthquake…     Nope.
birds and snakes…                      saw some birds, no snakes.
an aeroplane…                    it’s cloudy, but I heard one.
Lenny Bruce is not afraid…                 I’ll have to guess he’s not, at least because it’s been over 16 hours and nothing happened.
That’s enough no’s in the first line for me to call this apocalypse a dud.

Continue not panicking. I’ll update if anything interesting happens.

 

Digg This